Roller Screens
Contents
Roller screens are our specialty, mainly in the area of mineral (iron ore) processing. Thanks to WooDEM and customdeveloped pellet contact model, we can capture results from these complex machines quantitatively.
Screen types¶
Screens segregate feed into 2 or 3 resulting streams:

Classifiertype screens are used immediately after pelletizing (balling) discs and separate the feed into 3 streams: fine, product and coarse.

Feedertype screens are used to separate fine pellets from product, often used before green pellets go into furnace for burning. These screens sometimes have more than one deck.
Some screens can have a more complicated geometry, e.g. this one:
Dynamics¶
The screen is transporting pellets which undergo complex interactions between themselves and the rollers; rollers and gravity move pellets downward on the sieve.
This video shows differently sized pellets uNdresize in red, Onsize in green and oVersize in blue moving on a rather saturated screen:
The dynamics leads to some degree of separation in thick layers on the sieve:
The complexity fo the task requires some structure to describe what is happening − the contamination nomenclature.
Contamination quantification¶
Classifiertype screens¶
Novel terminology is used to described the sieving process in detail. Desired pellet size is defined by diameter range (usually d₀=9mm…d₁=16mm).
based on pellet diameter, we distinguish uNdersize (d<d₀), Onsize (d₀≤d≤d₁) and oVersize (d₁<d); these fractions are abbreviated as N, O, V.
based on pellet location, we distinguish Fine (the stream which ideally takes out the undersize fraction), Product (the stream which ideally takes out the onsize fraction) and Coarse (the stream which ideally takes out the oversize fraction). These streams are abbreviated as F, P, C. The feed stram is abbreviated as I (for Input).
As any pellet diameter can theoretically end up in any location, we have 9 combinations and note them with respective letter combination (NF = uNdersize in Fines, OF = Onsize in Fines, …):
Ideal, 100% accurate screen (of classifiertype) will send pellets from the feed based on their diameter uNdresize → Fine, Onsize → Product, oVersize → Coarse, thus the diagonal entries (NF, OP, VC) will be maximized and nondiagonal entries will be zero.
Real screens do suffer from inaccuracies, thus the nondiagonal entries, called contaminations, will not be zero.
Contaminations far from the diagonal, namely VF (oVersize pellets in Fines) and NC (uNdersize pellets in Coarse) are highly unlikely to occur, save in serious misconfiguration (process parameters out of range, machine fault, simulation problem)
Only OF (Onsize in Fines), VP (oVersize in Product), NP (uNdersize in Product) and OC (Onsize in Coarse) contaminations are relevant.
VP & NP degrade quality of the product (thus we call them degrading contaminations) whereas OF & OC diminish quantity of the product (thus we call them lossy contaminations). These two groups of contaminations are balancing each other − it is easy to have high quality but abysmal quantity (e.g. by handpicking and measuring suitable pellets); the challenge is to have acceptable quantity and acceptable quality.
OF & VP (under the diagonal) occur when pellets are screened earlier than they should, i.e. in smaller apertures. The cause is pellets being rolled flat by the rollers due to high vertical pressure from the pellet bed or when staying too long in the gap due to weak lateral transport (low inclination).
NP & OC (above the diagonal) occur when pellets are screened later than they should. This is often caused by excessive feed rate (oversaturation of the sieve, percolation), screen being too short, or lateral transport being too fast (high inclination).
Contaminations are specific points on the PSD curves of Input, Fine, Product, Coarse:
Material flow can be shown graphically using Sankey diagrams; this type of presentation is only useful for qualitative assessment, not for quantitative comparison, where the differences are too small to be distinguishable:
Feedertype screens¶
Feedertype screens are simpler in that they only separate Fines and Product (with pellet diameters being uNdersize and Onsize); they can be seen as a degenerated version of the classifier:
The contamination matrix is only 2×2 here, the relationship between PSD curves and contaminations is shown here:
Optimizing screen parameters¶
The screens have many tunable parameters; they have been tuned in the practice over last 100 years, but this involves halting the production and doing physical changes of the machine. Changing a parameter in the simulation is as easy as typing a new number. These include
number of rollers: total length of screen, number of rollers for different zones (fines, product);
gap sizes in different zones of the screen;
inclination of the screen (or even using nonlinear cylinder arrangement, such as broken slope);
roller angular velocity;
feed rate;
feed PSD;
…
Contamination nomenclature introduced above makes it easy to plot trends depending on the parameter being changed, or even multiple parameters. Knowing trends and understanding them is a necessary step for process optimization. Below are some examples.
Simulation results are stored in the standard HDF5 format for easy and automated processing with Python or Matlab or any other scientific package.
This is a plot of contaminations when number of gaps in the fine section changes (on the xaxis):
This plot shows the PSD of feed and all sections when altering angular velocity of the rollers:
Feedertype screen have only 2×2 contamination matrix, stacking the various atop each other (they cumulatively give 100% of the feed rate) is visually appealing and informative at once.
For multidimensional variation, visual maps can be built; in this case, number of rollers against NP contamination was plotted; each grid point represents one simulation:
Detail analysis¶
With WooDEM, we can not only report global flow statistics, but also analyze pellet flow down to single pellet, e.g. time pellets spend in a gap before falling through it and similar.